Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund
United States Supreme Court
576 U.S. 175, 135 S.Ct. 1318, 191 L.Ed.2d 253 (2015)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Omnicare, Inc. (defendant) filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission before the company’s initial stock offering to the public. The filing included an opinion that Omnicare believed that its pharmaceutical contracts complied with the law. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund and other funds (plaintiffs) bought Omnicare stock in response to the public offering. Subsequently, the federal government brought lawsuits against Omnicare related to Omnicare’s dealings with drug manufacturers. The pension funds sued Omnicare under section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, alleging that Omnicare’s registration statement contained false statements and omitted material information necessary to make the statement not misleading. The funds did not contend that the statements were fraudulent. The district court granted Omnicare’s motion to dismiss. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kagan, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.