From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
New Hampshire Supreme Court
1992 N.H. LEXIS 196 (1992)
Dennis Whelan (defendant) and his wife lived next door to an elderly woman. Whelan’s wife visited the woman almost daily and helped care for her. Attorney Daniel Smith handled the woman’s financial affairs and drafted her original will, a revision, and a codicil. Whelan was admitted to the New Hampshire bar and formed a law firm with Smith and another lawyer. The woman asked Whelan to draft a codicil to her will so that she could leave her real estate to Whelan and his wife. Whelan told the woman it would be improper for him to draft the codicil and to consult Smith. Smith drafted the codicil, in which the woman’s house and property were left to Whelan and his wife. In a disciplinary proceeding against Smith, the New Hampshire Supreme Court found that Smith had violated Rule 1.8(c) of the rules of professional conduct by preparing a codicil that benefited his partner, and Rule 1.10(a) by representing a client when Whelan would be prohibited from representing the client if he were practicing alone. The committee on professional conduct (plaintiff) requested that Whelan be suspended from the practice of law for violating those rules and for violating Rule 5.1(c)(2), which made a lawyer responsible for the violation of another lawyer in his firm, and Rule 8.4(a), which prohibited a lawyer from knowingly assisting or inducing another to violate the rules of professional conduct. Whelan argued that mere knowledge of a course of conduct does not constitute a violation of the ethical rules.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thayer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.